|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 14326 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Well we were due a change of format. It has been 4 years since the last change ...
[urlhttp://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/sport/wolves/16285209.Super_8s_set_to_be_scrapped_from_next_year/[/url
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 8658 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Good..at last..one up one down..
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 16274 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I wasn't a big fan of the middle 8s concept. However, the top 4 aspect of it did seem to stop the complaints about 'meaningless games'. In our glory days under TS when we used to win most weeks, the victories felt a bit hollow as there was always the feeling that it was 27 or however many games of going through the motions before the season started, when Leeds who had been mediocre all year would suddenly start winning.
Even now I think there's a weakness that whilst there's a big fight to get in to the top 4, there isn't that much reward for finishing higher within that - its just about getting a home fixture in a one-off knock out, where everybody is equal and one slip and you're out.
I wonder if it would be worth bringing back the old top 5 system that they used when they used from 1998 to 2001.
Then you had
Qualification playoff: 2 v 3 (winner progresses to qualification semi final, loser progresses to elimination semi final)
Elimination playoff: 4 v 5 (winner progresses to elimination semi final, loser OUT)
Week 2
Qualification semi final: 1 v winner of qualification playoff (winner progresses to Grand Final, loser progresses to preliminary final)
Elimination semi final: loser of qualification playoff v winner of elimination playoff (winner progresses to preliminary final, loser OUT)
Week 3
Preliminary final: loser of qualification semi final v winner of elimination semi final (winner progresses to Grand Final, loser OUT)
Week 4
Grand Final
Although it looks complicated when you first see it, its pretty straightforward. The first two weeks there is a game where you are playing for the right to a week off, and if you lose you have a second chance next week; and a game which is to stay alive in the competition. Then it gets to 3 teams left, one gets knocked out in week 3 and the last two standing play the Grand Final.
This system provided a staggered reward where each team gets a distinct advantage over the one that finished a place below. It is very difficult for a team finishing 5th, or even 4th, to win the Grand Final, they had to go on winning streaks playing away from home.
I think a 5 team playoff would be the right number in the current standard of SL.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 17406 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| How about finish top champions?...
Nope too radical. It'll never work.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 819 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2017 | 8 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote rubber duckie="rubber duckie"How about finish top champions?...
Nope too radical. It'll never work.'"
Careful you'll have the leeds fans on here in a minute telling us how great the GF is but then they would say that wouldn't they?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 1789 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2016 | 9 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote sally cinnamon="sally cinnamon"I wasn't a big fan of the middle 8s concept. However, the top 4 aspect of it did seem to stop the complaints about 'meaningless games'. In our glory days under TS when we used to win most weeks, the victories felt a bit hollow as there was always the feeling that it was 27 or however many games of going through the motions before the season started, when Leeds who had been mediocre all year would suddenly start winning.
Even now I think there's a weakness that whilst there's a big fight to get in to the top 4, there isn't that much reward for finishing higher within that - its just about getting a home fixture in a one-off knock out, where everybody is equal and one slip and you're out.
I wonder if it would be worth bringing back the old top 5 system that they used when they used from 1998 to 2001.
Then you had:
[note - team finishing higher in the league always has home advantage
Week 1 [team finishing 1st has week off
Qualification playoff: 2 v 3 (winner progresses to qualification semi final, loser progresses to elimination semi final)
Elimination playoff: 4 v 5 (winner progresses to elimination semi final, loser OUT)
Week 2
Qualification semi final: 1 v winner of qualification playoff (winner progresses to Grand Final, loser progresses to preliminary final)
Elimination semi final: loser of qualification playoff v winner of elimination playoff (winner progresses to preliminary final, loser OUT)
Week 3
Preliminary final: loser of qualification semi final v winner of elimination semi final (winner progresses to Grand Final, loser OUT)
Week 4
Grand Final
Although it looks complicated when you first see it, its pretty straightforward. The first two weeks there is a game where you are playing for the right to a week off, and if you lose you have a second chance next week; and a game which is to stay alive in the competition. Then it gets to 3 teams left, one gets knocked out in week 3 and the last two standing play the Grand Final.
This system provided a staggered reward where each team gets a distinct advantage over the one that finished a place below. It is very difficult for a team finishing 5th, or even 4th, to win the Grand Final, they had to go on winning streaks playing away from home.
I think a 5 team playoff would be the right number in the current standard of SL.'"
I too think this is the best play-off system we’ve had.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1178 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The grand final is too much of a money spinner to change, the SL won't change
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 14326 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote sally cinnamon="sally cinnamon"I wasn't a big fan of the middle 8s concept. However, the top 4 aspect of it did seem to stop the complaints about 'meaningless games'. In our glory days under TS when we used to win most weeks, the victories felt a bit hollow as there was always the feeling that it was 27 or however many games of going through the motions before the season started, when Leeds who had been mediocre all year would suddenly start winning.
Even now I think there's a weakness that whilst there's a big fight to get in to the top 4, there isn't that much reward for finishing higher within that - its just about getting a home fixture in a one-off knock out, where everybody is equal and one slip and you're out.
I wonder if it would be worth bringing back the old top 5 system that they used when they used from 1998 to 2001.
Then you had:
[note - team finishing higher in the league always has home advantage
Week 1 [team finishing 1st has week off
Qualification playoff: 2 v 3 (winner progresses to qualification semi final, loser progresses to elimination semi final)
Elimination playoff: 4 v 5 (winner progresses to elimination semi final, loser OUT)
Week 2
Qualification semi final: 1 v winner of qualification playoff (winner progresses to Grand Final, loser progresses to preliminary final)
Elimination semi final: loser of qualification playoff v winner of elimination playoff (winner progresses to preliminary final, loser OUT)
Week 3
Preliminary final: loser of qualification semi final v winner of elimination semi final (winner progresses to Grand Final, loser OUT)
Week 4
Grand Final
Although it looks complicated when you first see it, its pretty straightforward. The first two weeks there is a game where you are playing for the right to a week off, and if you lose you have a second chance next week; and a game which is to stay alive in the competition. Then it gets to 3 teams left, one gets knocked out in week 3 and the last two standing play the Grand Final.
This system provided a staggered reward where each team gets a distinct advantage over the one that finished a place below. It is very difficult for a team finishing 5th, or even 4th, to win the Grand Final, they had to go on winning streaks playing away from home.
I think a 5 team playoff would be the right number in the current standard of SL.'"
What is the advantage of this format though - it only offers an additional 1 place of interest.
We cannot avoid the fact there are meaningless games in terms of league position and honours in all sport. Look at football for example - there are many premiership and championship mid-table teams with a good following. At least the Super 8s and Qualifiers gave a bit of incentive in the lower league positions where top 4 was unobtainable.
In any case I don't think the falling attendances are due to the league structure. They are caused by the dull spectacle.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5552 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Perhaps Duck's first past the post would be the better format ,with an end of season knock out competition for all the SL teams playing for the sky trophy, which would fit perfectly with 16 teams. The final could still be played at Old Trafford ,but maybe it would give some more variety among competing clubs instead of the usual suspects year after year.
On the field ,perhaps increase the number of tackles in a set to ,hopefully,get the handling aspect back in the game & away from the boring kickathon that we used to criticise Rugby Union for.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 538 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2013 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2019 | Mar 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| As long as Sky are ploughing millions into the sport they will want a big say on the format of the competition. I for one would just like to see the winner takes all league format, but alas those days are long gone. Sky love their play offs and the big Finale.
If we have to have a play off lets keep it to a top four, the same as the aviva premiership. We need to increase the league by 2 teams next year so we get 13 home and away fixtures. If a Championship team comes up this year, how is it decided who the additional team will be?
I don't feel the need for an additional magic weekend fixture but i am sure we will get one none the less.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2079 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Jun 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Wires71="Wires71"In any case I don't think the falling attendances are due to the league structure. They are caused by the dull spectacle.'"
This. The game just isn't entertaining anymore. It used to be a tough game played by tough men. theres no entertainment in it anymore. The game is too clean, aggression has be taken out of the game systematically. It started proper going downhill once the choulder charge was deemed illegal. not players can't even fart without being pulled up two days later and banned by a pannel who watches the game back under a microscope. If it's not picked up in the gam it should be forgotten about. pushing/shoving should be penalty sufficient. player starting a fight should be given a yellow to calm down. a player defending himself should not be penalised, however if they continue the fight should also be a yellow. Chep shots in from the side/swinging arm, Straight red.
Anyway, back on topic...
The trouble with out play off, middle 8, top 40 whatever it is format is that it is by far to complicated. we need simplicity to bring in neutrals.
the new 1 up, 1 down with the million £ game being top 2 from the championship is perfect and it forces those at the bottom of the game to start performing rather than thinking "oh well the seasons over now, lets just coast till the super 8's start and we're on 0 points, start again. no. not now. you have to give your 100% every week to ensure you dont drop down.
at the top of the table I'd like to see 1st place win the LLS as per then play 4th place in a semi final to OT. 2 Vs 3 also in a straight semi to join 1st at OT. This would ensure that teams would have to be at their best every week to get themselves in the top 4.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2079 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Jun 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote kirtonLindseyWolf="kirtonLindseyWolf"I for one would just like to see the winner takes all league format, [ubut alas those days are long gone.[/u Sky love their play offs and the big Finale.'"
Rugby League has always had a playoff format hasn't it? In fact I'm pretty sure Assosianion Football is the only sport that uses the first past the post system. They are the ones who are the odd ones out.
|
|
|
 |
|